[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091215211450.GE26712@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 23:14:50 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Shirley Ma <mashirle@...ibm.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Subject: virtio: Add unused buffers detach from
vring
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:14:07AM -0800, Shirley Ma wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 20:47 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > + detach_buf(vq, i);
> > > + END_USE(vq);
> > > + return vq->data[i];
> >
> > In fact, this will return NULL always, won't it?
>
> Nope, I changed the destroy to detach and return the buffers without
> destroying them within the call. I thought it might be useful in some
> other case.
>
> Maybe I should put destroy call back?
>
> Thanks
> Shirley
No I think it's good as is, we do not need a callback.
I was simply saying that detach_buf sets data to NULL,
so return vq->data[i] after detach does not make sense.
You need to save data as comment below says.c
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists