[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B270841.2000203@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:53:37 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V7 1/8] this_cpu_ops: page allocator conversion
Hello,
On 12/15/2009 07:03 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> static __meminit void zone_pcp_init(struct zone *zone)
> {
> - int cpu;
> - unsigned long batch = zone_batchsize(zone);
> + /* Use boot pagesets until we have the per cpu allocator up */
> + zone->pageset = &per_cpu_var(boot_pageset);
Ummm... this scares me a little bit. Before it was a pointer to
statically allocated area which can be used from basically anywhere.
Now, it's being initialized to a percpu pointer which won't be
available before setup_per_cpu_areas() is complete and the above
initialization takes place from setup_arch() which is before percpu
initialization. I don't think there's anything which would access
page allocator between the two places, but it still seems a bit risky.
Maybe it's better to keep the boot_pageset a static array? Or am I
misunderstanding something?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists