[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B270AA6.3050307@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 13:03:50 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [this_cpu_xx V7 7/8] Module handling: Use this_cpu_xx to dynamically
allocate counters
(Rusty Russell cc'd.)
On 12/15/2009 07:03 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> @@ -479,15 +467,15 @@ static inline int try_module_get(struct
> int ret = 1;
>
> if (module) {
> - unsigned int cpu = get_cpu();
> if (likely(module_is_live(module))) {
> - local_inc(__module_ref_addr(module, cpu));
> + preempt_disable();
> + __this_cpu_inc(module->refptr->count);
> trace_module_get(module, _THIS_IP_,
> - local_read(__module_ref_addr(module, cpu)));
> + __this_cpu_read(module->refptr->count));
> + preempt_enable();
> }
> else
> ret = 0;
> - put_cpu();
I think you need preemption disabled while checking whether
module_is_live(). The state is protected by stop_machine or
synchronize_sched().
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists