linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16 (amd64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091216092424.5f87214c.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:24:24 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16 (amd64_edac)

On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:32:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> My usual call for calm: please do not put stuff destined for 2.6.34 into
> linux-next trees until after 2.6.33-rc1.
> 
> Changes since 20091215:


When CONFIG_SMP=n, CONFIG_X86_MSR=m:

ERROR: "msrs_free" [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "msrs_alloc" [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.ko] undefined!


Should EDAC_AMD64 also depend on SMP?

---
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/