linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16 (amd64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B2919BD.40001@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:32:45 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16 (amd64_edac)

On 12/16/2009 09:24 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:32:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My usual call for calm: please do not put stuff destined for 2.6.34 into
>> linux-next trees until after 2.6.33-rc1.
>>
>> Changes since 20091215:
> 
> 
> When CONFIG_SMP=n, CONFIG_X86_MSR=m:
> 
> ERROR: "msrs_free" [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "msrs_alloc" [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.ko] undefined!
> 
> 
> Should EDAC_AMD64 also depend on SMP?
> 

That seems absurd... more likely msrs_free/msrs_alloc should not be
SMP-specific, or stubs need to be provided.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/