[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-f4c4176f21533e22bcc292030da72bcfa105f5b8@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:34:02 GMT
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulus@...ba.org, acme@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf events: Allow per-task-per-cpu counters
Commit-ID: f4c4176f21533e22bcc292030da72bcfa105f5b8
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/f4c4176f21533e22bcc292030da72bcfa105f5b8
Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
AuthorDate: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:55:54 +0100
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:30:11 +0100
perf events: Allow per-task-per-cpu counters
In order to allow for per-task-per-cpu counters, useful for
scalability when profiling task hierarchies, we allow installing
events with event->cpu != -1 in task contexts.
__perf_event_sched_in() already skips events where ->cpu
mis-matches the current cpu, fix up __perf_install_in_context()
and __perf_event_enable() to also respect this filter.
This does lead to vary hard to interpret enabled/running times
for such counters, but I don't see a simple solution for that.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: fweisbec@...il.com
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
LKML-Reference: <20091216165904.831451147@...llo.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/perf_event.c | 11 +++++++----
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index 0dd8e5d..2e0aaa3 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -782,6 +782,9 @@ static void __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
add_event_to_ctx(event, ctx);
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ goto unlock;
+
/*
* Don't put the event on if it is disabled or if
* it is in a group and the group isn't on.
@@ -925,6 +928,9 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(void *info)
goto unlock;
__perf_event_mark_enabled(event, ctx);
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ goto unlock;
+
/*
* If the event is in a group and isn't the group leader,
* then don't put it on unless the group is on.
@@ -1595,10 +1601,7 @@ static struct perf_event_context *find_get_context(pid_t pid, int cpu)
unsigned long flags;
int err;
- /*
- * If cpu is not a wildcard then this is a percpu event:
- */
- if (cpu != -1) {
+ if (pid == -1 && cpu != -1) {
/* Must be root to operate on a CPU event: */
if (perf_paranoid_cpu() && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists