[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091216174524.GH11618@aftab>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:45:24 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16 (amd64_edac)
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 09:32:45AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/16/2009 09:24 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:32:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> My usual call for calm: please do not put stuff destined for 2.6.34 into
> >> linux-next trees until after 2.6.33-rc1.
> >>
> >> Changes since 20091215:
> >
> >
> > When CONFIG_SMP=n, CONFIG_X86_MSR=m:
> >
> > ERROR: "msrs_free" [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.ko] undefined!
> > ERROR: "msrs_alloc" [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.ko] undefined!
> >
> >
> > Should EDAC_AMD64 also depend on SMP?
> >
>
> That seems absurd... more likely msrs_free/msrs_alloc should not be
> SMP-specific, or stubs need to be provided.
see <arch/x86/lib/Makefile>:
obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) := msr.o
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
System | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany
Research | Geschäftsführer: Andrew Bowd, Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
(OSRC) | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists