linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16 (amd64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B2928AC.3020807@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:36:28 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
CC:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 16 (amd64_edac)

On 12/16/2009 09:45 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>>
>>> Should EDAC_AMD64 also depend on SMP?
>>
>> That seems absurd... more likely msrs_free/msrs_alloc should not be
>> SMP-specific, or stubs need to be provided.
> 
> see <arch/x86/lib/Makefile>:
> 
> obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) := msr.o
> 

Yes, because the stubs live as inlines in arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h.

This needs to be fixed ASAP.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/