[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091218065755.GA23808@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:57:55 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Some load-balancer cleanups
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> Since RT has since grown its own load-balancer which is totally independent
> from CFS, we can remove some of the left-overs from back when.
>
> Gets rid of the ->load_balance and ->move_one_task sched_class calls and
> removed the rq_iterator stuff.
>
> Also carries a lock-break recently found wanted by -rt.
>
> Compile tested with CGROUP/SMP/UP and booted on x86_64-SMP.
>
> include/linux/sched.h | 8 -
> kernel/sched.c | 1945 ++---------------------------------------------
> kernel/sched_fair.c | 1778 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> kernel/sched_idletask.c | 21 -
> kernel/sched_rt.c | 20 -
> 5 files changed, 1805 insertions(+), 1967 deletions(-)
Nice cleanups! I think we want to delay its application to the scheduler tree
for a week or two, to not interact with any urgent fixes for the .33 code.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists