lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9bd6b5360912172259x17ee93d6y631ab52988f8965a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:59:17 +0800
From:	sniper <s3c24xx@...il.com>
To:	Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Simplify offset calculation method for ctree.h

2009/12/18 Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>:
> sniper wrote:
>> No, many pointers in btrfs function arguments are not pointing to an
>> absolute address, but relative to the start address of extent.
>> Take following function as example, argument inode_item is an offset
>> value to the beginning of leaf. So we can't reach its member with
>> &inode_item->xxx
>
> Notice that we are not reach its member, we are getting pointer of its
> member with &inode_item->mtime.
> This operation have same effect as old one.

right!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ