lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:39:50 +0800
From:	sniper <s3c24xx@...il.com>
To:	Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Simplify offset calculation method for ctree.h

No, many pointers in btrfs function arguments are not pointing to an
absolute address, but relative to the start address of extent.

Take following function as example, argument inode_item is an offset
value to the beginning of leaf. So we can't reach its member with
&inode_item->xxx

>  static inline struct btrfs_timespec *
>  btrfs_inode_mtime(struct btrfs_inode_item *inode_item)
>  {
> -       unsigned long ptr = (unsigned long)inode_item;
> -       ptr += offsetof(struct btrfs_inode_item, mtime);
> -       return (struct btrfs_timespec *)ptr;
> +       return &inode_item->mtime;
>  }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ