linux-kernel - Re[2]: epoll'ing tcp sockets for reading

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <473915329.20091221123402@mail.ru>
Date:	Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:34:02 +0300
From:	Nikolai ZHUBR <zhubr@...l.ru>
To:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
CC:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re[2]: epoll'ing tcp sockets for reading

Monday, December 21, 2009, 8:46:15 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Also, you should be conscious that the time you'd waste doing this is
> probably greater than the delta time between two reads on two distinct
> sockets, which means that in practice you will not necessarily report
> data in the network order, but you'll just be approximately fair
> between all FDs, at the expense of a high syscall overhead caused by
> small reads.
Agreed absolutely.
Anyway, I think I should stop abusing the ml at this point :)
Thank you!

Nikolai ZHUBR


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/