linux-kernel - Re: [fuse-devel] utimensat fails to update ctime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:43:25 +0100
From:	Jean-Pierre André <jean-pierre.andre@...adoo.fr>
To:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
CC:	Eric Blake <ebb9@....net>, fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [fuse-devel] utimensat fails to update ctime

Hi,

OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>> I suggest I port Miklos patch to fuse-lite soon,
>> and delay the low-level case (and microsecond
>> precision) until January. Does that suit your needs ?
>>      
> Thanks. Sounds good. I'm not using ntfs-3g actually, I just bridged the
> bug report on lkml to others. Eric?

Attached is a proposed patch for selective update
of timestamps in ntfs-3g (based on the release
candidate version ntfs-3g-2009.11.14AC.2).

It includes the backport of Miklos's patch posted
yesterday to fuse-lite. As a matter of fact fuse-lite
is needed, because I do not know how to make this
compile with unpatched fuse.

Note : this does not yet include  sub-second precision.

Regards

Jean-Pierre

View attachment "utimensat.patch" of type "text/plain" (6234 bytes)