[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091223095239.GD24181@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:52:39 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Salman Qazi <sqazi@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@...gle.com>,
Taliver Heath <taliver@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: A proposal for power capping through forced idle in the
Linux Kernel
Hi!
> > OTOH realtime people already have tools you could make good use of:
> > your power capping approach looks like 'high priority idle task that
> > needs to run for 2 seconds every 5 seconds' or something...
> >
> > Talk to rt people?
>
> At the core of it, you are correct. However, in our implementation it
> also avoids running when the system is already idle and operates at
> much finer granularities than seconds.
Seconds were examples, I suspect rt kernels need lower granularities,
to.
> Which specific tools are you referring to? Real-time Linux as a whole
> is a trade off: one gets predictable latency in exchange for some
> performance. Any specific contacts that I should direct my inquiries
> to?
I guess Peter and Ingo (added to the Cc)....
Anyway, I guess that what you really want is to be able to change
priority of the idle threads, even making them realtime...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists