linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator/lp3971: Storage class should be before const qualifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091223140311.GB14455@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:03:11 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator/lp3971: Storage class should be before const
	qualifier

On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 02:13:17PM +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
> 
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> feature.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/