linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator/lp3971: Storage class should be before const qualifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1261649590.3554.2.camel@odin>
Date:	Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:13:10 +0000
From:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To:	Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator/lp3971: Storage class should be before const
 qualifier

On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 14:13 +0100, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> The C99 specification states in section 6.11.5:
> 
> The placement of a storage-class specifier other than at the beginning
> of the declaration specifiers in a declaration is an obsolescent
> feature.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/lp3971.c |   10 +++++-----
>  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 

Applied.

Thanks

Liam

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/