[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B3269BB.5020406@windriver.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:04:27 -0600
From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
To: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
CC: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm_fb_helper: fix regression in pixclock check
Clemens Ladisch wrote:
> Jason Wessel wrote:
>
>> Commit 5349ef3127c77075ff70b2014f17ae0fbcaaf199 changed pixclock to be
>> initialized to zero instead of -1.
>>
>
> Zero meaning "there is no pixel clock value". When I wrote the patch,
> the FB (helper) code did not use this value at all, so zero was the only
> value that could possibly be used.
>
>
>> The validation routine always returns -EINVAL for a valid pixclock
>>
>
> It declares that the only valid pixclock value is "none". This was
> required to make the userspace API work, since the GET ioctls return
> this value, and all programs expect to be able to PUT this value back.
>
>
>> which prevents atomic kernel mode setting from working correctly.
>> ...
>> @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ int drm_fb_helper_check_var(struct fb_var_screeninfo *var,
>>
>> - if (var->pixclock != 0)
>> + if (!var->pixclock)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>
> This change breaks the userspace API again, unless the other parts of
> the code have been changed to always return a valid pixclock value when
> reading the current mode settings.
>
> If we want to accept both zero and non-zero values for pixclock, this
> check should be dropped altogether.
>
> In drm_fb_helper_set_par(), there is a corresponding check that must be
> kept in sync with this one.
>
>
Fair enough. We'll make a special case for when the kernel debugger is
active.
Looks to me like it worked by luck during the 2.6.32 kernel cycle for
the atomic kernel mode setting. I have changed it in the next version
of this patch to always return -EINVAL while the kernel debugger is
active. This restores the atomic kernel mode setting back to the
working state, until we can find a better solution.
Thanks,
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists