[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091223220228.GE2719@verge.net.au>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 09:02:29 +1100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/7] [patch] DT3155: Use pci_get_device
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 08:19:32AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 07:54:49PM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > The use of pci_find_device() is deprecated.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Compile tested only.
> >
> > Alternatively, if pci_find_device() really needs to be used
> > then this code needs to depend on PCI_LEGACY.
> >
> > Index: gregkh-2.6/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- gregkh-2.6.orig/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c 2009-12-23 18:41:46.000000000 +1100
> > +++ gregkh-2.6/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c 2009-12-23 18:42:29.000000000 +1100
> > @@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ static int find_PCI (void)
> > unsigned long base;
> > unsigned char irq;
> >
> > - while ((pci_dev = pci_find_device
> > + while ((pci_dev = pci_get_device
>
> You can't just replace these two functions, they operate differently
> with regard to the reference counting logic. Otherwise it wouldn't make
> sense to have 2 different functions :)
>
> So I can't apply this.
Sorry about that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists