[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091223233728.GA19703@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2009 15:37:29 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/7] [patch] DT3155: Use pci_get_device
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 09:02:29AM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 08:19:32AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 07:54:49PM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > The use of pci_find_device() is deprecated.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Compile tested only.
> > >
> > > Alternatively, if pci_find_device() really needs to be used
> > > then this code needs to depend on PCI_LEGACY.
> > >
> > > Index: gregkh-2.6/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- gregkh-2.6.orig/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c 2009-12-23 18:41:46.000000000 +1100
> > > +++ gregkh-2.6/drivers/staging/dt3155/dt3155_drv.c 2009-12-23 18:42:29.000000000 +1100
> > > @@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ static int find_PCI (void)
> > > unsigned long base;
> > > unsigned char irq;
> > >
> > > - while ((pci_dev = pci_find_device
> > > + while ((pci_dev = pci_get_device
> >
> > You can't just replace these two functions, they operate differently
> > with regard to the reference counting logic. Otherwise it wouldn't make
> > sense to have 2 different functions :)
> >
> > So I can't apply this.
>
> Sorry about that.
No problem, care to fix it up properly?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists