[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200912242310.42615.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:10:42 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Asynchronous suspend/resume - test results
On Thursday 24 December 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
Hi,
> I built the async branch of your tree and tested it, also running
> 2.6.33-rc1 + TuxOnIce for comparison. Dmesg for both are attached. Is
> there anything I can/should be doing for you on top of this?
No, thanks a lot.
> I'll try Dmitry's patch on top of this a little later - other things to do first.
No need for that, the patchset contains an equivalent of the Dmitry's patch.
> I noticed that you were doing standard deviations in your stats - how
> many runs were you basing them on?
I usually run 10 iterations of suspend-resume for each configuration.
The raw data are at http://www.sisk.pl/kernel/data/async-suspend-updated.pdf
if you're interested.
> Not sure that I can be bothered to do too many - too much else to do!
Sure, thanks a lot anyway. Your data confirn that there's a measurable gain
from suspending and resuming devices asynchronously.
Have a merry Christmas and happy new year,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists