linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Asynchronous suspend/resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B32D2D6.3030707@crca.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 24 Dec 2009 13:32:54 +1100
From:	Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Asynchronous suspend/resume - test results

Hi.

I built the async branch of your tree and tested it, also running
2.6.33-rc1 + TuxOnIce for comparison. Dmesg for both are attached. Is
there anything I can/should be doing for you on top of this? I'll try
Dmitry's patch on top of this a little later - other things to do first.

I noticed that you were doing standard deviations in your stats - how
many runs were you basing them on? Not sure that I can be bothered to do
too many - too much else to do!

Regards,

Nigel

View attachment "m1530-sync.dmesg" of type "text/plain" (148713 bytes)

View attachment "m1530-async.dmesg" of type "text/plain" (148219 bytes)