| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <24388.1261947979@n20.hq.graphstream.com> Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 13:06:19 -0800 From: Craig Dunwoody <cdunwoody@...phstream.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org CC: cdunwoody@...phstream.com sage weil writes (2009/12/21): >If you want stability, then it's probably too early to merge. If you >want active users, that essentially hinges on stability too. But if >it's interest in/demand for an alternative distributed fs, then the >sooner it's merged the better. I understand there are many considerations about when to merge something new, but in general would like to see the Ceph client merged sometime soon. In my view, there is a wide range of applications for which Ceph has the potential to be significantly more efficient than the other distributed file systems that I know about. Ceph has a solid architecture and a small but strong dev team. I believe that the project is now at a point where wider-scale testing can greatly accelerate progress toward production-level usability. Having the client in mainline will help reduce barriers to such testing. Craig Dunwoody GraphStream Incorporated -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists