[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1001031149380.29885-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 11:55:10 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
open-osd <osd-dev@...n-osd.org>,
Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>,
Stable Tree <stable@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [osd-dev] [PATCH] scsi_lib: Bug in completion of bidi commands
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> > What patch of mine are you referring to? So far James has rejected all
> > the patches I have submitted recently. I'm going to try again in the
> > near future...
> >
>
> OK, that's my answer, I didn't know.
>
> Would you want that I attempt that collapsing of scsi_end_request() into scsi_io_completion
> and the cleanup that implies? (that's the patch I meant.)
Okay, I don't mind if you would like to rewrite that patch. The
version I wrote didn't just move code from one subroutine to another;
it also made a few semantic changes (the retry counter and the "error"
argument to blk_end_request()). You'll probably want to break it
up into a few patches, where the first simply moves the code around and
the later ones do more significant things.
As I recall, the most recent version of that patch is here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=123991011815404&w=2
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists