[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <daef60381001030855o3a39c3fdr879e2634fb85c491@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 00:55:04 +0800
From: Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: saeed bishara <saeed.bishara@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
Tomaso Paoletti <tpaoletti@...iumnetworks.com>,
Chris Dearman <chris@...s.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <Paul.Gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, Coly Li <coly.li@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stack2core: show stack message and convert it to core
file when kernel die
I didn't give the user raw oopses.
I give him core file. When the kernel die, do we can get a core file now?
(gdb) bt
#0 0xc0008470 in kernel_init (unused=<value optimized out>)
at /home/teawater/kernel/arm_versatile_926ejs.glibc_std.standard/build/linux/init/main.c:916
#1 0xc0042660 in sys_waitid (which=<value optimized out>, upid=<value
optimized out>, infop=0x0, options=0, ru=0x14)
at /home/teawater/kernel/arm_versatile_926ejs.glibc_std.standard/build/linux/kernel/exit.c:1798
Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
It show which line make kernel die.
Hui
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 00:44, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 12:30:20AM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
>> This S2C: message just for program s2c.
>> s2c can convert it to a core file. Then gdb can do a clear analyse
>> with this file.
>> Then you can get more message than current we can get.
>
> I understand that. What I'm saying is that all the additional noise
> you're causing the kernel to create is just a pure duplication of
> what we already dump.
>
> Oops dumps are already noisy enough - especially if they cause a panic
> at the end (where you end up with two backtraces.) We do not need even
> more noise caused by needless duplication.
>
> You can get everything you need already from the kernel. On ARM, we
> already dump out all the registers and the _full_ stack. There is no
> need for you to implement your own register dumping code and full stack
> dump on top of that again.
>
> So, I'm not going to accept your patch for the ARM kernel. Please use
> what's already provided - it's more than adequate. By doing so, you
> don't penalise those of us who want to read the raw oopses.
>
> Talking about noisy oopses, I'm getting one with 2.6.33-rc2 on 'poweroff'
> shutdown. No idea what it is because most of it's scrolled off the top of
> the screen and I can't scroll back. Not bothered about it at the moment.
> What it does illustrate though is why making things too noisy when problems
> occur makes it _more_ difficult to find out what went wrong.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists