[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100104043650.6acfb056@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:36:50 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: "Youquan,Song" <youquan.song@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, suresh.b.siddha@...el.com,
kent.liu@...el.com, chaohong.guo@...el.com, youquan.song@...el.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]tickless: Fix tick nohz timer irq0 fail to increaase
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 05:49:05 -0500
"Youquan,Song" <youquan.song@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Tickless is disabled by nohz=off, which is used in OSVs.
it is? I doubt anyone wants to normally disable tickless, the power
cost is just too high....
> But in
> current kernel, if tickless is disabled, the timer irq0 will not
> increase.
why is this a problem?
> Because the timer event handler should be
> tick_handle_periodic, but actually event handler keep as
> tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast which is used in tickless. The root
> cause is that it is default to enable high resolution timer which
> will force to oneshot broadcast mode.
using local apic in one shot mode is not a problem, I'd in fact call it
a feature...
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists