[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1262608597.6408.117.camel@laptop>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:36:37 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: avoid huge bonus to sleepers on busy
machines
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 13:30 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Any diddling of sleeper fairness would have to be accompanied with a
> preemption model change methinks.
Just told jays the exact same thing on IRC ;-)
Also, workloads are interesting, the signal test thing is the easiest to
test the preemption side, various things like QPID show the down-side
iirc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists