[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100104044024.5390ff1c@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 04:40:24 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: volano ~30% regression with 2.6.33-rc1 & -rc2
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:15:58 +0800
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com> wrote:
> Mike & Peter,
>
> Compared with 2.6.32, volano has ~30% regression with 2.6.33-rc1 &
> -rc2. Testing machine: Tigerton Xeon, 16cpus(4P/4Core), 16G memory
did this show up only on this cpu?
(since this is a multi-core-without-shared-cache cpu, it could be that
we get the topology wrong and think cores share cache where they don't)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists