[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17220.1262705013@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:23:33 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric B Munson <ebmunson@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nommu: reject MAP_HUGETLB
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk> wrote:
> We've agreed to restore the rejection of MAP_HUGETLB to nommu.
> Mimic what happens with mmu when hugetlb is not configured in:
> say -ENOSYS, but -EINVAL if MAP_ANONYMOUS was not given too.
On the other hand, why not just ignore the MAP_HUGETLB flag on NOMMU?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists