| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100105152612.GA18897@suse.de> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 07:26:12 -0800 From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> To: Jake Edge <jake@....net> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org, stable-review@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [Stable-review] [PATCH 97/97] Linux 2.6.32.3-rc1 On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:10:00AM -0700, Jake Edge wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jan 2010 06:58:54 -0800 Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 06:13:07PM -0700, Jake Edge wrote: > > > On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:33:50 -0800 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > > > +EXTRAVERSION = .3-rc1 > > > > > > This looks like a typo. Why the '-rc1'? > > > > I'm curious as to why you feel this is a typo when I was announcing > > the release of the 2.6.32.3-rc1 kernel? > > my apologies, i thought you were announcing the review of the 2.6.32.3 > kernel. it would seem i misunderstood, but i hadn't noticed patches > like this in previous stable reviews, and i thought that version string > would end up in the 2.6.32.3 release, which, i think anyway, would be > wrong. Yes, I did do it differently this time, using git format-patch due to the way some of the patches were, which made it easier this way. Sorry for any confusion. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists