[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100107084700.0fa053a3@torg>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 08:47:00 -0600
From: Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
To: Carsten Emde <Carsten.Emde@...dl.org>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [rt-tests] change to cyclictest behavior
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 08:23:52 +0100
Carsten Emde <Carsten.Emde@...dl.org> wrote:
> Clark,
>
> >> -S --smp Standard SMP testing (equals -a -t -n -d0),
> >> same priority on all threads.
> After having done some tests with a quickly hacked cyclictest version, I
> have found an issue with including -d0. Apparently, small numbers make
> life especially difficult for the scheduler; this is why we often used
> -d1. Specifying -d0 seems a special case where all threads are in sync.
> Maybe, we may miss some important latency constellations, if we do not
> let the tasks slightly interfere. In any case, I would like to be able
> to specify a distance _in addition_ to -S. This would create a scenario
> where
>
> cyclictest -d1 -S
>
> results in a distance of 0, and
>
> cyclictest -S -d1
>
> results in a distance of 1. Would this be acceptable?
>
> Carsten.
I don't have a problem not having -d in the -S option. I was looking at
the possibility of synchronous sampling as well so it's probably a good
idea to keep it separate.
The main things we want are implied -t, -a and -n.
Clark
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists