[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100107145126.22271109.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:51:26 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: Fix unused variable warning in sbs.c
On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 19:27:56 +0600
Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com> wrote:
> Fix unused variabled warning.
>
> When CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER=n and CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=n, then
> we're warned by the following warning:
>
> drivers/acpi/sbs.c: In function `acpi_battery_remove':
> drivers/acpi/sbs.c:825: warning: unused variable `battery'
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
> ---
>
> --- linus/drivers/acpi/sbs.c 2009-12-28 12:37:29.000000000 +0600
> +++ rakib/drivers/acpi/sbs.c 2010-01-03 11:29:07.000000000 +0600
> @@ -822,7 +822,10 @@ static int acpi_battery_add(struct acpi_
>
> static void acpi_battery_remove(struct acpi_sbs *sbs, int id)
> {
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER) || defined(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER)
> struct acpi_battery *battery = &sbs->battery[id];
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER
> if (battery->bat.dev) {
> if (battery->have_sysfs_alarm)
Rather an unpleasant patch to a rather unpleasant function :( Oh well,
it's better than a warning.
I wonder if it can be fixed in Kconfig. Is there any sane use of
this code when CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER=n && CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=n?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists