linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] acpi: Fix unused variable warning in sbs.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b9df5fa11001072304i71b7e08ctb4f71504cee4f45d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jan 2010 13:04:05 +0600
From:	Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: Fix unused variable warning in sbs.c

On 1/8/10, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:

>
>  I wonder if it can be fixed in Kconfig.  Is there any sane use of
>  this code when CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER=n && CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER=n?
>
No. Making it depend on CONFIG_ACPI_SYSFS_POWER ||
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_POWER, doesn't make sense too.
What about wrapping around acpi_battery_remove with #ifdef from
it's calling point.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/