[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DA586906BA1FFC4384FCFD6429ECE860316C0011@shzsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:45:02 +0800
From: "Zheng, Shaohui" <shaohui.zheng@...el.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"y-goto@...fujitsu.com" <y-goto@...fujitsu.com>,
Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH - resend] Memory-Hotplug: Fix the bug on interface
/dev/mem for 64-bit kernel(v1)
Hmmm....could you rewrite /dev/mem to use kernel/resource.c other than
modifing e820 maps. ?
Two reasons.
- e820map is considerted to be stable, read-only after boot.
- We don't need to add more x86 special codes.
[Zheng, Shaohui] Kame, when I write this patch, I also feel confused whether update e820map. Because of the dependency in function page_is_ram, so we still update it in my patch.
I see that Fengguang already draft patches to change function page_is_ram, the new page_is_ram function use kernel/resource.c instead. That is great that we can still keep a stable e820map. I will resend the patch which update variable high_memory, max_low_pfn and max_pfn only.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists