[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c441001120115g44a0198fub708d85439ef09ec@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:15:31 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"ananth@...ibm.com" <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] x86: use dmi check to treat disabled cpus as
hotplug cpus.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> some systems that have disable cpus entries because same
>> BIOS will support 2 sockets and 4 sockets and more at
>> same time, BIOS just leave some disable entries, but
>> those system do not support cpu hotplug. we don't need
>> treat disabled_cpus as hotplug cpus.
>>
>> so we can make nr_cpu_ids smaller and save more space
>> (pcpu data allocations), and could make some systems run
>> with logical flat instead of physical flat apic mode
>
> .. but this one I detest.
>
> We can't play games that depend on us always filling in some DMI table
> correctly. Things need to "just work".
maybe could change to list that doesn't need to treat disabled cpus as
hotplug cpus?
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists