[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1263330474.2854.548.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:07:54 -0800
From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make Intel 8-way Xeons boot again
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 13:02 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 12:20 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 11:10 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> if the system can not use logical flat.
> >>
> >> should have some bit set in FADT...
> >
> > Yinghai, Sorry. I am not sure what you are referring to here. I have
> > mentioned about FADT in another thread, so not sure what you mean by
> > this here.
> >
> > Are you referring that bios for the IBM system can use this to fix their
> > problem? Once we understand what the problem is with IBM platform, then
> > we can propose a solution (using FADT perhaps) that is acceptable to
> > everyone.
> >
>
> Does the IBM platform set this bit in FADT?
No. If they had set it, kernel would have used physical mode and
wouldn't have seen this issue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists