linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Make Intel 8-way Xeons boot again

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4B4CE35D.4040801@zytor.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:02:21 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make Intel 8-way Xeons boot again

On 01/12/2010 12:20 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 11:10 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> if the system can not use logical flat.
>>
>> should have some bit set in FADT...
> 
> Yinghai, Sorry. I am not sure what you are referring to here. I have
> mentioned about FADT in another thread, so not sure what you mean by
> this here.
> 
> Are you referring that bios for the IBM system can use this to fix their
> problem? Once we understand what the problem is with IBM platform, then
> we can propose a solution (using FADT perhaps) that is acceptable to
> everyone.
> 

Does the IBM platform set this bit in FADT?

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/