[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100112232145.GA10576@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:21:45 -0800
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4][RESENT] add MAP_UNLOCKED mmap flag
* Gleb Natapov (gleb@...hat.com) wrote:
> v3->v4
> - return error if MAP_LOCKED | MAP_UNLOCKED is specified
...
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -962,6 +962,12 @@ unsigned long do_mmap_pgoff(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> if (!can_do_mlock())
> return -EPERM;
>
> + if (flags & MAP_UNLOCKED)
> + vm_flags &= ~VM_LOCKED;
> +
> + if (flags & MAP_UNLOCKED)
> + vm_flags &= ~VM_LOCKED;
> +
> /* mlock MCL_FUTURE? */
> if (vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
> unsigned long locked, lock_limit;
Looks like same patch applied twice rather than adding the
(MAP_LOCKED | MAP_UNLOCKED) check.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists