[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100113092849.GS7549@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:28:49 +0200
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4][RESENT] add MAP_UNLOCKED mmap flag
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 03:21:45PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Gleb Natapov (gleb@...hat.com) wrote:
> > v3->v4
> > - return error if MAP_LOCKED | MAP_UNLOCKED is specified
> ...
> > --- a/mm/mmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> > @@ -962,6 +962,12 @@ unsigned long do_mmap_pgoff(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
> > if (!can_do_mlock())
> > return -EPERM;
> >
> > + if (flags & MAP_UNLOCKED)
> > + vm_flags &= ~VM_LOCKED;
> > +
> > + if (flags & MAP_UNLOCKED)
> > + vm_flags &= ~VM_LOCKED;
> > +
> > /* mlock MCL_FUTURE? */
> > if (vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) {
> > unsigned long locked, lock_limit;
>
> Looks like same patch applied twice rather than adding the
> (MAP_LOCKED | MAP_UNLOCKED) check.
>
Thanks Chris, will resend.
--
Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists