| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <m3vdf66o2x.fsf@intrepid.localdomain> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:07:02 +0100 From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Crypto test results unused? Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> writes: >> I think we need a way to differentiate between "really unknown" and >> "failed", do we need another flag for it? > > It doesn't matter. We test all algorithms at registration time. > So unknown means failed except during registration. So should we change "selftest: unknown" to "failed" then? -- Krzysztof Halasa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists