linux-kernel - Re: [patch] hugetlb: Fix section mismatches #2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1001131250510.24847@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:51:16 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: [patch] hugetlb: Fix section mismatches #2

On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Jeff Mahoney wrote:

>  hugetlb_register_node calls hugetlb_sysfs_add_hstate, which is marked with
>  __init. Since hugetlb_register_node is only called by
>  hugetlb_register_all_nodes, which in turn is only called by hugetlb_init,
>  it's safe to mark both of them as __init.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>

Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/