[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201001132244.49209.mitov@issp.bas.bg>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 22:44:48 +0200
From: Marin Mitov <mitov@...p.bas.bg>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tycorp.com.au>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Section mismatch: acpi_early_processor_set_pdc()
Hi all,
kernel-2.6.33-rc4, compiler output:
WARNING: Section mismatch in reference from the function
acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() to the variable .cpuinit.data:processor_idle_dmi_table
The function acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() references
the variable __cpuinitdata processor_idle_dmi_table.
This is often because acpi_early_processor_set_pdc lacks a __cpuinitdata
annotation or the annotation of processor_idle_dmi_table is wrong.
acpi_early_processor_set_pdc() is invoked only from __init acpi_bus_init()
Mark it __cpuinit.
The patch is against 2.6.33-rc4
Signed-off-by: Marin Mitov <mitov@...p.bas.bg>
===========================================================================
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c 2010-01-13 21:53:14.000000000 +0200
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_pdc.c 2010-01-13 21:58:39.000000000 +0200
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@
return AE_OK;
}
-void acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void)
+void __cpuinit acpi_early_processor_set_pdc(void)
{
/*
* Check whether the system is DMI table. If yes, OSPM
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists