linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3][v2] vmstat: add anon_scan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Jan 2010 08:50:06 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3][v2] vmstat: add anon_scan_ratio field to zoneinfo

Hi

> Hi, Kosaki.
> 
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:21 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
> <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > Changelog
> >  from v1
> >  - get_anon_scan_ratio don't tak zone->lru_lock anymore
> >   because zoneinfo_show_print takes zone->lock.
> 
> When I saw this changelog first, I got confused.
> That's because there is no relation between lru_lock and lock in zone.
> You mean zoneinfo is allowed to have a stale data?
> Tend to agree with it.

Well. zone->lock and zone->lru_lock should be not taked at the same time.
[1/4] of my last version removed zone->lock, then get_anon_scan_ratioo()
can take zone->lru_lock. but I dropped it. thus get_anon_scan_ration() can't
take zone->lru_lock.

Thus, I added need_update parameter.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/