[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28c262361001132112i7f50fd66qcd24dc2ddb4d78d8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:12:25 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3][v2] vmstat: add anon_scan_ratio field to zoneinfo
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 8:50 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
>> Hi, Kosaki.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 5:21 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
>> <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > Changelog
>> > from v1
>> > - get_anon_scan_ratio don't tak zone->lru_lock anymore
>> > because zoneinfo_show_print takes zone->lock.
>>
>> When I saw this changelog first, I got confused.
>> That's because there is no relation between lru_lock and lock in zone.
>> You mean zoneinfo is allowed to have a stale data?
>> Tend to agree with it.
>
> Well. zone->lock and zone->lru_lock should be not taked at the same time.
I looked over the code since I am out of office.
I can't find any locking problem zone->lock and zone->lru_lock.
Do you know any locking order problem?
Could you explain it with call graph if you don't mind?
I am out of office by tomorrow so I can't reply quickly.
Sorry for late reponse.
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists