[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B4EDE5C.8040600@hitachi.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:05:32 +0900
From: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
To: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext3: prevent reread after write IO error
Hi,
Hidehiro Kawai wrote:
> This patch fixes the similar bug fixed by commit 95450f5a.
>
> If a directory is modified, its data block is journaled as metadata
> and finally written back to the right place. Now, we assume a
> transient write erorr happens on that writeback. Uptodate flag of
> the buffer is cleared by write error, so next access on the buffer
> causes a reread from disk. This means it breaks the filesystems
> consistency.
After sending this patch, I noticed that I have to deal with
the bh_uptodate_or_lock() case as well. Actually, I confirmed
a data block sharing happens between two inodes. Allocate a new
block, then modified bitmap goes to the fs, but it fails due to
a transient IO error. Next access on the bitmap buffer cause a
reread from disk. As a result, the allocated block becomes
a FREE block! So this block can be shared by different two inodes.
I'll send the revised version later.
Thanks,
--
Hidehiro Kawai
Hitachi, Systems Development Laboratory
Linux Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists