[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B4EEE86.7080807@hitachi.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:14:30 +0900
From: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Satoshi OSHIMA <satoshi.oshima.fk@...achi.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ext3: prevent reread after write IO error v2
This patch fixes the similar bug fixed by commit 95450f5a.
If a directory is modified, its data block is journaled as metadata
and finally written back to the right place. Now, we assume a
transient write erorr happens on that writeback. Uptodate flag of
the buffer is cleared by write error, so next access on the buffer
causes a reread from disk. This means it breaks the filesystems
consistency.
To prevent old directory data from being reread, this patch set
uptodate flag again in the case of after write error before issuing
the read operation. The write error on the directory's data block
is detected at the time of journal checkpointing or discarded if a
rewrite by another modification succeeds, so no problem.
Similarly, this kind of consistency breakage can be caused by
a transient write error on a bitmap block.
I tested this patch by using fault injection approach.
By the way, I think the right fix is to keep uptodate flag on write
error, but it gives a big impact. We have to confirm whether
over 200 buffer_uptodate's are used for real uptodate check or write
error check. For now, I adopt the quick-fix solution.
Signed-off-by: Hidehiro Kawai <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>
---
fs/ext3/balloc.c | 12 ++++++++++++
fs/ext3/inode.c | 13 +++++++++++++
fs/ext3/namei.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext3/balloc.c b/fs/ext3/balloc.c
index 27967f9..5dc5ccf 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/balloc.c
@@ -156,6 +156,18 @@ read_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int block_group)
if (likely(bh_uptodate_or_lock(bh)))
return bh;
+ /*
+ * uptodate flag may have been cleared by a previous (transient)
+ * write IO error. In this case, we don't want to reread its
+ * old on-disk data. Actually the buffer has the latest data,
+ * so set uptodate flag again.
+ */
+ if (buffer_write_io_error(bh)) {
+ set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
+ unlock_buffer(bh);
+ return bh;
+ }
+
if (bh_submit_read(bh) < 0) {
brelse(bh);
ext3_error(sb, __func__,
diff --git a/fs/ext3/inode.c b/fs/ext3/inode.c
index 455e6e6..67d7849 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/inode.c
@@ -1077,10 +1077,23 @@ struct buffer_head *ext3_bread(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
return bh;
if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
return bh;
+
+ /*
+ * uptodate flag may have been cleared by a previous (transient)
+ * write IO error. In this case, we don't want to reread its
+ * old on-disk data. Actually the buffer has the latest data,
+ * so set uptodate flag again.
+ */
+ if (buffer_write_io_error(bh)) {
+ set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
+ return bh;
+ }
+
ll_rw_block(READ_META, 1, &bh);
wait_on_buffer(bh);
if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
return bh;
+
put_bh(bh);
*err = -EIO;
return NULL;
diff --git a/fs/ext3/namei.c b/fs/ext3/namei.c
index 7b0e44f..7ed8e45 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/namei.c
@@ -909,7 +909,20 @@ restart:
num++;
bh = ext3_getblk(NULL, dir, b++, 0, &err);
bh_use[ra_max] = bh;
- if (bh)
+ if (!bh || buffer_uptodate(bh))
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * uptodate flag may have been cleared by a
+ * previous (transient) write IO error. In
+ * this case, we don't want to reread its
+ * old on-disk data. Actually the buffer
+ * has the latest data, so set uptodate flag
+ * again.
+ */
+ if (buffer_write_io_error(bh))
+ set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
+ else
ll_rw_block(READ_META, 1, &bh);
}
}
--
1.6.0.3
--
Hidehiro Kawai
Hitachi, Systems Development Laboratory
Linux Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists