[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1263460380.4244.285.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:13:00 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- INFO: possible recursive locking --
(s_active){++++.+}, at: [<c10d2941>] sysfs_hash_and_remove+0x3d/0x4f
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 19:09 -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> I agree weird. Either you don't have my patch working correctly or I
> talk a good good game but I don't have a clue about lockdep
> subclasses.
Subclasses and classes are basically the same thing, except that
subclasses are an 'easy' way to modify the regular class of an object.
Subclasses are limited to 7, 0 (the regular class), 1-7 subclasses.
Subclasses (just like regular classes) have no intrinsic ordering, their
order is given by the lock hierarchy.
Anything else you want to know?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists