linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- INFO: possible recursive locking -- (s_active){++++.+}, at: [<c10d2941>] sysfs_hash_and

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:09:06 -0800
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- INFO: possible recursive locking --  (s_active){++++.+}, at: [<c10d2941>] sysfs_hash_and_remove+0x3d/0x4f

Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com> writes:

> Hmm.  I tried your patch applied to a clean 2.6.33-rc4 tree, and used
> the same .config file.  This time the INFO looks a lot like my
> original bug report.  Weird.  Maybe I am doing something wrong!

I agree weird.  Either you don't have my patch working correctly or I
talk a good good game but I don't have a clue about lockdep
subclasses.

Grrr.

Now to see if I can find some time to dig into this.  Thank you very
much for testing.

Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/