linux-kernel - [PATCH] scsi/sd.c: quiet all sparse noise

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201001131845.32125.hartleys@visionengravers.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:45:31 -0700
From:	H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
To:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	James.Bottomley@...e.de
Subject: [PATCH] scsi/sd.c: quiet all sparse noise

scsi/sd.c: quiet all sparse noise

In sd_store_cache_type the symbol 'len' is declared twice.
Remove the second declaration to quiet the following
sparse warning.

warning: symbol 'len' shadows an earlier one

In sd_probe the variable 'index' is declared as a u32. This variable is
used in a call to ida_get_new which is expecting an int *. Make
the variable an int to quiet the following sparse warning.

warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different signedness)

There are 4 symbols in the file that are not exported and produce
the following sparse warnings.

warning: symbol 'sd_cdb_cache' was not declared. Should it be static?
warning: symbol 'sd_cdb_pool' was not declared. Should it be static?
warning: symbol 'sd_read_protection_type' was not declared. Should it be static?
warning: symbol 'sd_read_app_tag_own' was not declared. Should it be static?

Make them static to quiet the warnings.

H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
James E.J. Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>

---

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 255da53..987a12e 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ static DEFINE_IDA(sd_index_ida);
  * object after last put) */
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(sd_ref_mutex);
 
-struct kmem_cache *sd_cdb_cache;
-mempool_t *sd_cdb_pool;
+static struct kmem_cache *sd_cdb_cache;
+static mempool_t *sd_cdb_pool;
 
 static const char *sd_cache_types[] = {
 	"write through", "none", "write back",
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ sd_store_cache_type(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sd_cache_types); i++) {
-		const int len = strlen(sd_cache_types[i]);
+		len = strlen(sd_cache_types[i]);
 		if (strncmp(sd_cache_types[i], buf, len) == 0 &&
 		    buf[len] == '\n') {
 			ct = i;
@@ -1369,7 +1369,7 @@ sd_spinup_disk(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
 /*
  * Determine whether disk supports Data Integrity Field.
  */
-void sd_read_protection_type(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer)
+static void sd_read_protection_type(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer)
 {
 	struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device;
 	u8 type;
@@ -1896,7 +1896,7 @@ defaults:
  * The ATO bit indicates whether the DIF application tag is available
  * for use by the operating system.
  */
-void sd_read_app_tag_own(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer)
+static void sd_read_app_tag_own(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, unsigned char *buffer)
 {
 	int res, offset;
 	struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device;
@@ -2217,7 +2217,7 @@ static int sd_probe(struct device *dev)
 	struct scsi_device *sdp = to_scsi_device(dev);
 	struct scsi_disk *sdkp;
 	struct gendisk *gd;
-	u32 index;
+	int index;
 	int error;
 
 	error = -ENODEV;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/