[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100113.174141.169192840.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:41:41 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: joe@...ches.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netdev: patchwork.ozlabs.org vs patchwork.kernel.org ?
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:40:37 -0800
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 17:32 -0800, David Miller wrote:
>> Encoding your patches as base64 binary octet stream attachments
>> causes them to get missed by our automated patch tracking system:
>>
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/
>
> What is the reason why netdev doesn't use patchwork.kernel.org?
>
> It seems odd that it doesn't. Odd like the arm mailing lists.
ozlabs was the original, and so just like powerpc port that's where we
started using the tool.
I honestly don't care where it's hosted.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists