[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1263433744.1966.52.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:49:04 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netdev: patchwork.ozlabs.org vs patchwork.kernel.org ?
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 17:41 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:40:37 -0800
> > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 17:32 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> >> Encoding your patches as base64 binary octet stream attachments
> >> causes them to get missed by our automated patch tracking system:
> >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/
> > What is the reason why netdev doesn't use patchwork.kernel.org?
> > It seems odd that it doesn't. Odd like the arm mailing lists.
> ozlabs was the original, and so just like powerpc port that's where we
> started using the tool.
> I honestly don't care where it's hosted.
Neither do I, but it might be nice to put a link
to the patchwork.ozlabs.org queues on this page
http://patchwork.kernel.org/
(or the other way 'round, or both)
so there's a centralized listing of all linux related
patchwork queues.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists